|
Page 2 of 7
Expert Opinion
Lean wide application
George Alukal , ASQ (American Society for Quality) Fellow and certified quality engineer notes [2] that lean methodologies are receiving increasing attention by quality professionals and managers. Lean methodologies are originally derived largely from the very successful Toyota Production System (TPS) which is based on the use of common sense quality improvement tools. Over time lean methodologies have been extended from a pure manufacturing environment to a wider "lean enterprise" emphasis.
While traditionally used within the manufacturing industries, lean methodologies are increasingly being applied within service organisations such as financial institutions, government operations, and hospitals. Each organisation has different expectations which require individual consideration, however there are common threads associated with all lean implementations. While the application of lean tools and techniques is mostly common sense, sustaining lean implementations requires discipline, motivation, incentives, good change management, and strong long-term leadership. After working with a few hundred organisations Alukal reports the following common essentials required for successful lean implementations:
- A well-thought-out master plan, including
- Plans for cultural change
- Communication
- Lean training
- Standardisation , or embedding, practices at the improved level, plus
- Rewards and recognition
- Alignment of company goals with individual and team goals.
- A plan to address the fear of downsizing associated with lean improvements.
Lean Manufacturing
Lean manufacturing techniques focus strongly on reducing inventory levels and the elimination of waste, with the objective of this focus being to impact the cost, quality, and delivery times of finished goods. Common lean techniques for minimising inventory levels and eliminating waste include:
- Just-in-Time/continuous-flow production
- Quick-changeover techniques
- Predictive or preventative maintenance
- Focused-factory production systems
- Bottleneck/constraint removal.
The benefits derived from lean production systems can include:
- more efficient use of personnel
- less time needed to field new products or services
- higher profitability, and
- greater system flexibility
Lean methodologies differ markedly from traditional management and accounting practices. Thomas Johnson a professor of business administration at Portland State University who was awarded the 2001 Shingo Prize for Excellence in Manufacturing Research writes [3] that lean practices involve:
- Viewing operations in real time rather than in an abstract manner and while being removed from the actual work site location. By way of contrast traditional management practices often involve working with quantitative data and its associated financial information which is viewed well after workplace events have taken place.
- Focusing on total costs rather than unit costs. The widely used practice of pushing employees to achieve average unit cost targets tends to create unstable processes. It has been shown that chasing average unit costs whilst driving up output rates tends to actually increase total costs. The reason for this is that average unit costs are an abstraction far removed from the reality of actual operations.
- Using customer-pull continuous flow operations through using control mechanisms built into the actual work environment itself. For production control customer pull sets the schedule, and cost control is achieved by designing work processes that provide every employee at every moment with clear visibility of precisely what must be done to complete each single order. By comparison, traditional manufacturing organisations use external systems and management accounting methods to control production.
- Carefully and patiently building relationships within an organisation rather sacrificing certain elements of an operation in pursuit of financial targets. Lean systems aim to operate every part as a balanced and integrated whole.
Empowering employees to detect and correct anomalies promptly is a normal expectation of work in a lean setting. Abnormalities are not considered to be an individual's fault, but rather a consequence of a breakdown in the pattern of relationships inherent in the work. By contrast in traditional settings errors are often attributed to an individual person, or machine. Such errors are usually detected by inspecting work after it is completed.
The president of Schonberger & Associates, Richard Schonberger, wrote [4] that lean methodologies have been developed to new levels; he refers to basic lean processes as "Lean Lite" and the newer processes as "Lean Extended". The following table adapted from Schonberger [2] outlines the differences between the two systems:
| Lean Lite |
Lean Extended |
| Competitive Focus: |
| Inward – the factory |
Outward – Customer & Supplier collaboration |
| Customers/Suppliers |
| Teacher/pupil partnerships |
Full collaborators |
| Company Organisation |
| Functional Independence |
Joint Planning |
| Product Ownership |
| Engineering |
Broad scope; subject to industrial restructuring |
| Main Emphasis |
| Inward – attack waste |
Customer – ever better quality, quicker response, greater flexibility, higher value |
| Improvements |
| Expert –driven projects with sporadic associate involvement |
Continuous – all employee-driven, data driven, includes projects |
| Goals/metrics/Data |
| "Make your numbers"- drill down from high level aggregated metrics |
Low level – roll up from root causes; data supersedes metrics |
| Modelled After |
| Toyota and others |
Wall Mart, Dell, others |
With "Lean Extended" the dominant objectives are ever improving quality, quicker response, greater flexibility, and higher value in addition to the dominant objective defined by traditional lean initiatives i.e. the elimination of waste. A central distinguishing feature of Lean Extended practices is the extensive company-to-company collaboration that it encourages. The extended process also tends to assign ownership to the party having most advanced capabilities at a given time and this tends to encourage the use of best practices. Companies using Lean Extended methodologies have demonstrated significant performance achievements.
Lean categories of waste
George Alukal [5] outlines the following categories of waste addressed through the use of lean principles:
- Overproduction; providing excess goods, (or earlier than required), to the next stage in the process.
- Inventory; carrying more materials, parts or information than necessary.
- Correction of defects; e.g. quality problems necessitating rework, repair or replacement.
- Over processing; effort that adds no value to the product or service from the customer's viewpoint.
- Idle time; delays while waiting for manpower, materials, information, machinery or equipment, inspection and sign-offs etc.
- Personnel; underutilising employee experience, knowledge, creativity and skills.
- Motion; Unnecessary extra movement by personnel that does not add value from a customer's viewpoint.
- Transportation; excess or unnecessary movement of parts or information.
Through the continuous reduction (or elimination) of each of these categories of waste, costs, cycle times and quality problems may be significantly reduced.
Lean Thinking
Womack and Jones [6] describe the following five step process associated with lean thinking and lean transformation activities:
- Specify value from the standpoint of the end customer
- Identify all the steps in the value stream
- Make the value creating steps flow toward the customer
- Let customers pull value from the next upstream activity
Value Stream Mapping (VSM) and continuous improvement projects are key components of lean analysis and its implementation. According to Alukal [2] each VSM experience leads to the preparation of:
The future state map is used for kaizen events which address identified bottlenecks and constraints. VSM procedures can enable total lead times to be drastically reduced and bring them closer to value-added processing times. The aim being to maximise the value-added activities and to minimise lead times. The implementation plans serve as a guide for reducing the different kinds of waste, and acts as a guide for moving organisations or processes from the current state to a desired future state.
Peter Coote a principal at the Wexner management consultancy, and Stathis Could, a technical manager at the International Federation of Accountants, provides [7] the following guidelines for delivering customer value without waste in a financial accounting environment:
- Focus on those products/services where benchmarking indicates that costs are high and value is relatively low.
- Gain an understanding of the customers that are associated with these products/services and probe for their definition of value.
- Assign clear process ownership for the value stream that produces the product/service.
- Frequently measure the process effectiveness and efficiency.
- Build a culture of continuous improvement and use this as the foundation for ongoing transformational change.
Jamie Flinchbaugh co-founder of the Lean Learning Center stated [8] that lean is not simply a methodology to be implemented on a once-only basis and then be forgotten, lean is intended to be an ongoing journey that enhances everyday learning. Through the rigorous application of each lesson learned, organisations can achieve significant improvements; however the creation, and the sustaining, of a "learning culture" is not easy and requires a special combination of curiosity and humility. This combination leads to the enabling of individuals, and organisations, to readily admit that there are better ways of achieving most things. Armed with this knowledge and by working with persistence and discipline, important discoveries can be made leading to significant improvements.
Lean and Six Sigma
Lean and Six Sigma are powerful management philosophies with tool sets which compliment, rather than compete with, one another. Alien Pannell [9] an executive consultant specialising in process innovation and redesign, explains that lean generally involves a "macro" approach, dealing with improving lead-times, reducing inventory, and eliminating waste. Six Sigma on the other hand focuses more on sub-processes. The following chart adapted from [9] outlines the key performance indicators found in lean and Six Sigma:
| Measure |
Lean impact |
Six Sigma Impact |
| Sales growth |
Seeks to increase process capacity to meet demand created by reducing lead times |
Seeks to increase product quality which encourages increased demand |
| Return on Investment |
Reduces system waste, lowers costs, minimises inventory i.e. investment, and increases sales |
Reduces waste in scrap, rework, warranty, and improves customer retention, thereby decreasing costs and increasing sales |
| Productivity |
Seeks to eliminate non-value added work and to increase throughput |
Reduces rework and increases yields |
| Customer Satisfaction |
Satisfaction improved by reducing lead times and inventory costs and via flexible transactions |
Satisfaction improved by superior product quality and reliability |
_________________________________________________________
You are reading a Management Brief Report in html-format. Become a member of the BPIR to receive a new report in PDF-format every month (see examples: Benchmarking & Business Excellence). PDF-format can be saved on your hard drive, emailed to work colleagues, and are much easier to read and print out!.. For BPIR updates and best practices sign up to our FREE newsletter.
|